Natural disasters will hurt 50% more people by 2015. Why? Climate Change + Inequality
There has been some striking progress in reducing the death toll from natural disasters in recent decades. While Cyclone Sidr killed around 3,000 people in Bangladesh in 2007, similar or weaker storms killed 100 times that number in 1972 and 45 times more people in 1991, largely because governments and local communities have since taken action to reduce risk.
Now that is all under threat from climate change. A new Oxfam report shows that each year, on average, almost 250 million people are affected by ‘natural’ disasters, the vast majority of them climate-related such as hurricanes, droughts and floods (earthquakes are comparatively rare).
But the numbers are rising - by 2015, this could grow by more than 50 per cent to an average of over 375 million people affected by climate-related disasters each year, in part because of climate change. (see graph.)
Climate change could also increase the threat of new conflicts, which will mean more people displaced, and the need for more humanitarian aid. One recent report estimated that 46 countries will face a ‘high risk of violent conflict’ when climate change exacerbates traditional security threats. Already, there is evidence that the number of conflicts is again on the rise.
Rising vulnerability and the grinding machinery of climate change form a deadly combination. What to do? Firstly recognize that when it comes to human impact, disasters are anything but ‘natural.’ They pick on poor people. In rich countries, an average of 23 people die in any given disaster; in the least-developed countries this is 1,052. Some groups – women and girls, the chronically sick, the elderly, and others – are even more vulnerable, their ability to cope undermined by discrimination, inequality, or poor physical health.
For many of the world’s poor people, four trends threaten to further increase their vulnerability:
- there are many more people living in urban slums built on precarious land.
- the increasing pressure on farmland, caused by drought, population density, and increasing demand for meat and dairy products in emerging economies, means that more people will find it difficult to get enough to eat.
- climate change, environmental degradation, and conflict are likely to drive more people from their homes, stripping them of their livelihoods, assets, and the networks of family and communities that can support them. Some estimates suggest that up to one billion people will be forced from their homes by 2050.
- the global economic crisis is increasing unemployment and undermining social safety nets.
This poses a big challenge to the international aid system, including organizations like Oxfam, which in November 2008 was directly assisting 3.3 million people with humanitarian needs.
It will need more money (the world spent more on video games in 2006 than it did on international humanitarian assistance – see chart). But it will also need to work differently: in the past, is has used centralised, logistics-heavy interventions geared to large-scale catastrophes. In the future, humanitarian organisations will need to focus more on building local capacity to help prevent, prepare for, and respond to a proliferation of smaller climate-related shocks.
The report concludes that the humanitarian challenge of the twenty-first century consists of an increasing total of largely local catastrophic events, increasing numbers of people vulnerable to them, too many governments failing to prevent or respond to them, and an international humanitarian system unable to cope. In the face of that, disaster-affected people need:
- A far greater focus on building national governments’ capacity to reduce risk and respond to disasters;
- A far greater focus on helping people and communities to become less vulnerable to disasters; and
- An international humanitarian system that acts quickly and impartially to provide effective and accountable assistance.
Latest Climate Change blog posts
-
13 Aug 2010
|
Natalie Brook
0 comments
-
22 Jun 2010
|
Natalie Brook
1 comments
-
17 Jun 2010
|
Frida Eklund
1 comments
-
16 Jun 2010
|
Frida Eklund
0 comments
-
1 Jun 2010
|
Ulrike Langer
1 comments

Comments
Our silence is a clear and present danger to the Earth
Too few people are expressing concern and outrage about the reckless dissipation of Earth's resources and the relentless degradation of its environs. As a consequence, the voice of the human community is not yet reverberating and being heard within the highest echelons of international organizations and nation-states.
Steven I entirely agree!
Steven I entirely agree! No one seems to want to address that so many of our humanitarian problems and conflicts are the result of environmental destruction and climate change caused by the most powerful countries in the world. Too often the environment is pushed to the side because wars and humanitarian issues are more important. Only when these forces realize that the environment is linked to these issues and thus becomes a humantiarian issue in and of itself will we really be able to prevent them.
Outraged by silence.............
"Truth is not only violated by falsehood; it may be equally outraged by silence." Henri-Frederic Amiel
Climate change could also
Climate change could also increase the threat of new conflicts, which
will mean more people displaced, and the need for more humanitarian
aid. One recent report estimated that 46 countries will face a ‘high
risk of violent conflict’ when climate change exacerbates traditional
security threats. Already, there is evidence that the number of
conflicts is again on the rise.
<a href=http://www.boediger.net/>boediger</a>
Climate Change
Check out this video on climate change. The girl is drowning for the cause. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4XopQ0btlA&feature=channel_page
re:
As a consequence, the voice of the human community is not yet reverberating and being heard within the highest echelons of international organizations and nation-states.
Natural Disasters
I don't believe There is even a climate change happening, it was already proven that the earth has cycles as it allways has, they said there was a hole in the ionosphere but then later it was proven it was a normal routine. it seems many people are so ignorant of what was already told 2000 Years ago in the bible, and it is happening exactly as it says. it would be good if people looked up and studied end times in the bible because thats what the real truth is, and the end isn't far away. but many wouldnt know this as they are doing the same as they did in the days of noah, drinking , marrying, the their usual routine and yet Noah new what was coming and they just mocked him and they all drowned. The same is going to happen soon because no body wants to believe what God says is true.
Post new comment