Mukuru slum, Nairobi, Kenya. Photo: Eleanor Farmer/Oxfam
Mukuru slum, Nairobi, Kenya. Photo: Eleanor Farmer/Oxfam

The opportunity of a generation: Ending extreme inequality

17 July, 2014 | General

It could be the opportunity of a generation.

The world can be proud of the progress made towards ending poverty - as I see for myself when I visit the toughest places, the cynics have been proven wrong by successful efforts to combat disease, to increase access to drinking water sources, and to get girls into school. But, as Oxfam witnesses in work on the ground, and as the expert number-crunchers attest, the completion of this progress is now jeopardized by extreme inequality. 

To end poverty we must tackle this inequality which is causing economic, social and political harm to us all, rich and poor alike. Billionaires like Warren Buffett agree with the communities we work with - we can build a world fairer than this.

There is a growing consensus that rising and extreme economic inequality is harmful to us all: Pope Francis has called inequality the “root of social evil”; a French Economist, Thomas Piketty, is achieving rock star levels of fame for his book on inequality and capital,  and President Obama has warned that it threatens the American dream. Inequality is a major concern of the World Economic Forum, The World Bank, and the IMF.

At the same time a global conversation convened by the United Nations is asking us – citizens and companies and experts and governments - to define what world we want to live in by 2030. 

The Millennium Development Goals are set to expire next year. This week in New York, the latest negotiations aim to agree a new global framework for development post-2015. With many others, Oxfam is working to ensure that this framework makes clear and ambitious commitments to the two issues that will determine whether we succeed in eliminating poverty; climate change and inequality.

This must be the moment where we say loud and clear that world we want is a more equal world. 

Oxfam is calling for a goal for ending extreme economic inequality.  

We back the target proposed by Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz - to reduce income inequality so that the income of the top 10 per cent is no more than that of the bottom 40 per cent. We also support calls for a separate goal on gender inequality, and are pleased that so many governments agree this should be part of the framework.

We need to tackle extreme inequality because is morally indefensible and socially corrosive – undermining our health, affecting our well-being, and undermining peaceful societies. We also need to tackle it because it is increasingly understood to undermine growth

The good news is solutions exist.

Extreme inequality is not inevitable. There is no one-size-fits-all solution, but countries that have successfully reduced inequality provide some guidance:

  • Crack down on financial secrecy and tax dodging. Financial secrecy sucks money up from the real economy into the hands of the richest few, while denying the majority their fair stake. Developing countries lose billions annually to corporate tax dodging. This is a drain of vital revenues that governments could put to work to invest in social spending, public goods, and social safety nets for those falling most in need.
     
  • Invest in universal access to healthcare and education. Public services provide everyone with “virtual income”, fighting inequality by putting more in the pockets of everyone - the poorest especially. 
     
  • Strengthen wage floors and worker rights. Earning a decent wage is central to not only overcoming poverty, but to reducing extreme inequality as well, by ensuring the proceeds of growth go to not just employers and corporations, but ordinary working people. 
     
  • Remove the barriers to equal rights and opportunities for women. There is persuasive evidence that gender equality - particularly in jobs and education – encourages growth. Strong development, growth that is inclusive, and women’s rights are fundamentally bound together.
     

Equality is what people are asking for.

The Stiglitz proposal is to reduce extreme inequality so that we can truly end poverty, and help ensure that governments can do their job in using taxes and transfers to create societies and economies that work for us all. It is what people want: the CIVICUS 2014 report showed how recent social movements across the world are primarily concerned by economic inequality. 

This weeks’ negotiations must deliver an agreement which tackles the key issues facing the global community. Let’s listen to the voices of the many, commit to a more equal world, and make it a reality.

Recent blogs from Winnie Byanyima

Developing countries must be at the heart of Global Tax Reform

World needs to get off the bench and get in the game on resolving conflict in Africa

Comments

My thought

As a catholic Christian, I agree with the Pope. We, also need to increase jobs in the United States. Obama and Congress needs to work together on this.  Government policy can help a great deal

Owner CEL Financial Services

 

My Thoughts

When we can creatively and diligently work together to find positive solutions to eliminate inequalities, all other areas of concern, including poverty, can improve. Poverty eradication is the greatest global challenge, but when we can empathize with others' views and needs, have a deep concern for justice, respect human rights, develop a sense of fairness, and believe that people can make a difference then reflective and strategic thinking can take place. It is through those conversations and developed action plans that a resolution can be achieved.

Population control and inequality

Population control is also key in tackling inequality, especially at national level. Moreover a more equal community or nation is well placed to advocate for the same globally; but soaring numbers of people in states where resources are ever more inelastic is catalyst for greater social and economic inequality as the rich minority can afford better services while the majority poor remain unable to receive social services like family planning, cannot afford education, and the system cannot support the many.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Permalink: http://oxf.am/eBK